We use cookies to improve your experience and optimize user-friendliness. Read our privacy policy for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them. To continue browsing our site, please click accept.
Winning Back-Office Strategies to Boost Your Business Agility
VIEWpoint Issue 1 | 2023
2023 Compliance Trends: Staying Ahead in an Evolving Regulatory E...
SBA Lenders Beware of BSA
IRS Delays New Reporting Rule for Online Payment Processors
4 Ways to Prepare for Next Year’s Audit
By Theresa Greer, CVA, CFE – Manager, Valuation and Litigation Support Group
Estimating lost profits is not always straight forward. It is important to look behind a company’s financials for signs they might have been manipulated or falsified, especially during a down economy.
Lost profits calculations are intended to make a business “whole” again — not to provide a windfall from the loss. Put another way, the calculations estimate what the business would have earned “but for” the opposing party’s alleged wrongdoing or the catastrophic event that interrupted normal business operations.
Financial experts can help a business calculate not just lost sales, but also the avoided costs because of the lost sales. To determine avoided costs, the business’s expenditures generally must be split between:
Direct costs. Examples include raw materials and direct labor, which are often directly related to the production of a specific product or the offering of a service, and almost always vary proportionately with the volume of production.
Indirect costs. These include items such as overhead and indirect labor, which may be fixed or variable. Fixed costs, such as rent, are often the same regardless of the level of production (at least within a certain range). Variable costs, such as shipping expenses, depend on production or sales levels.
Experts typically subtract from lost sales the incremental cost of producing those sales. The incremental cost generally includes direct costs plus indirect costs that vary with the volume of production, both of which are avoided when sales are lost. However, because the business continues to incur fixed costs, despite the lost sales, subtracting those costs can distort the lost profits analysis, if not accounted for properly.
Experts may turn to a company’s income statement or tax returns to help estimate lost sales and avoided costs. But how do you know that historical amounts are accurate? And do historical amounts reflect what’s expected to happen in the future? Experts cannot just accept management’s representations at face value. Instead, they must look at the numbers with professional skepticism.
Consider this hypothetical example: Company A was forced to shut down for six months in order to rebuild its headquarters due to a fire. It had to file a claim under its business interruption insurance policy for lost profits and other damages.
The insurance policy defined lost profits as “net profit before taxes, plus continuing normal operating expenses, including payroll.” Business interruption policies typically compensate the insured for certain payroll and other continuing expenses to relieve the business owner from the burden and expense associated with replacing key employees once operations are restored.
In this case, Company A submitted a claim for lost profits that included the continuing salaries of its six regional sales managers. The company also provided copies of payroll tax returns to substantiate the expense. After interviewing the sales managers, however, the forensic accountant who reviewed the claim became suspicious.
Further investigation revealed the payroll tax returns had never been filed and the taxes had not been paid. Inquiries with relevant government agencies also indicated all six employees were collecting unemployment benefits. As a result of the expert’s forensic skepticism, payroll costs were eliminated from the company’s lost profits and damages claim.
Professional skepticism also requires experts to consider whether there’s opportunity, rationalization or pressure to commit fraud. For example, an owner of a struggling business that would be difficult to sell might see an excessive lost profits recovery as his or her way to cash out of the business.
The existence of these three elements of opportunity, rationalization or pressure — known as the “fraud triangle” — does not always indicate an inflated estimate of lost profits. But it is important to be aware of the parties’ motives during challenging times, such as now, and consider their potential effect on the calculation.
Need help estimating your lost profits? Contact Doeren Mayhew’s advisors today.
This publication is distributed for informational purposes only, with the understanding that Doeren Mayhew is not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional opinions on specific facts for matters, and, accordingly, assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with its use. Should the reader have any questions regarding any of the news articles, it is recommended that a Doeren Mayhew representative be contacted.
A quick registration is required to view our resources.
You will only be asked to do this one time (unless you don't save your browser cookies).