We use cookies to improve your experience and optimize user-friendliness. Read our privacy policy for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them. To continue browsing our site, please click accept.
2023-2024 Tax Planning Guide
Winning Back-Office Strategies to Boost Your Business Agility
VIEWpoint Issue 1 | 2023
A Refresher on the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty for Business Owner...
Valuations Can Help Business Owners Plan for the Future
SBA Lenders: Beware of BSA
An individual retirement account (IRA) rollover is a popular way of retaining investment flexibility and tax benefits when switching from one IRA to another. However, a recent U.S. Tax Court decision has limited the ability to use this technique.
Background
One of the ways an individual may make a tax-free transfer between two IRAs is by taking a distribution from one IRA and then depositing the distributed amount into a second IRA within 60 days after the distribution (an “IRA rollover”). The tax law permitting such rollovers provides individuals may complete only one such rollover within a year. However, the law does not speak to whether the limitation means “one rollover per individual” or “one rollover per IRA.”
Example: James has two IRAs: IRA#1 and IRA#2. In January, James rolls over IRA#1 to rollover IRA#3. In August, James rolls over IRA #2 to rollover IRA#4.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had adopted the second interpretation, applying the one-year limitation on an account-by-account basis. Based on the above example, the IRS would have allowed both rollovers since, according to the IRS, an individual could complete any number of IRA rollovers in a one-year period, provided that no single IRA was rolled over more than once. This position was stated both in the IRS’s Publication 590, Retirement Arrangements (IRAs), and proposed regulations.
New Interpretation of Limit
In the recent case, the Tax Court concluded that the IRS’s interpretation of the rollover statute was incorrect. Thus, using the example above, the rollover of IRA#2 to IRA#4 would not be allowed since an individual could not make an IRA-to-IRA rollover if he or she had made such a rollover involving any of the individual’s IRAs in the preceding one-year period.
Shortly afterwards, the IRS announced that it would follow the Tax Court’s ruling. However, recognizing the Tax Court’s decision would require IRA trustees to make administrative changes, the IRS also announced that it will not apply the new interpretation to any rollover that involves an IRA distribution occurring before January 1, 2015. As a result, beginning with distributions after December 31, 2014, individuals will be permitted to make only one rollover of one IRA in any given one-year period.
Keep in mind this limit on the number of rollovers does not apply to direct transfers from one IRA trustee to another. To help understand this new interpretation of rollover limits and how it impacts your plans for IRA rollovers, seek the advice of our tax advisors in Michigan, Houston or Ft. Lauderdale.
This publication is distributed for informational purposes only, with the understanding that Doeren Mayhew is not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional opinions on specific facts for matters, and, accordingly, assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with its use. Should the reader have any questions regarding any of the news articles, it is recommended that a Doeren Mayhew representative be contacted.
A quick registration is required to view our resources.
You will only be asked to do this one time (unless you don't save your browser cookies).